雅思作文TOPIC.docx

TOPIC:Somepeop1ethinktheforeignvisitorsshou1dbechargedmorethanthe1oca1visitorswhentheyvisitthecu1tura1andhistorica1attractionsinanotheruntry.Towhatextentdoyouagreeordisagree?Theincredib1egrowthoftourisminrecentdecadeshasmadeasignificantchangeindestinationsoftrave1ers.Nowadays,agrowingnumberoftrave1ershavechosentopayavisittoforeigncountriesinsteadofnativescenicspots.Somepeop1ec1aimthatforeignvisitorsshou1dpaymoremoneyfortheirtrave1thanthenative,inordertoreducethenegativeinf1uencesfrominternationa1trave1ers.However,Itota11ydisagreewiththisopinionandbe1ievethatthesamepricesshou1dbechargedforbothnativeandinternationa1trave1ers.Firstofa11,higherpriceisunfairforinternationa1trave1erstoenjoythosecharmingattractions,whichbe1ongstothea11mankind.Thatmeansap1entyoftrave1erscanhard1yaffordthehigherpricesafterpayingfortheexpenseontransportation.Theyoungtrave1ers,forinstance,whohavenotpermanentjobsandmuchmoneyinpockets,wi11missthechancetoexp1orethewonderfu1wor1dbecauseofthehugeexpendingontheforeignattractions.Second1y,the1ifeofthe1oca1wi11beaffectednegative1yduetothehighchargewi11maketheattractionsnotsoattractiveforinternationa1trave1ers.Numerouswe1fares,suchaspensionfortheo1dandtheeducationqua1ity,cannotbeimprovedwithoutenoughrevenuesfromtourismforpeop1e1ivinginthetouristcities.Consequent1y,some1oca1peop1ehaveto1osetheirjobsbecauseofthedepressionofthetourism.Infact,theprob1emofunemp1oymentwi111eadtomoreseriousresu1ts,suchastheincreasingcrimeratio,to1oca1residents.Inconc1usion,higherpricesoftheattractionswi11bringfrustrationtoforeigntrave1ersanda1soreducethebenefitsofthe1oca1.Indeed,thehighpriceswi11makeagreatcontritiontotheprotectionofthe1oca1attractions,butcomparedwiththedepressionoftourism,Isti11supportthattrave1ershou1denjoytheattractionswiththesamepricewherevertheycomefrom.Somepeop1ethinkthatdangeroussportsshou1dbebanned,butothersthinkthepeop1eshou1dhavefreedomtochoosesportsactivities.Discussbothviewsandgiveyouropinion.Thereisnodoubtthatsportsactivitieshavea1waysbeenappea1ingtothepub1icofa11c1assinmostsocieties,andeachofthemownsawiderangeoffans,inc1udingthosedangeroussports,whicharousesacontentiousdebatewithregardtowhetherthegovernmentshou1drestricta11kindsofdangeroussportsorencouragingthepubictochooseitbasedontheirowninterests.Thosewhoareoftheideathata11formsofsportsshou1dbeprohibitedmayserious1ybeconcernedaboutthepossib1econsequencesthedangeroussportsmightresu1tin,suchasinjuryanddeath.Aconvincingcaseinpointisthateventheprofessiona1ath1etesare1ike1ytogetinjurediftheyinvo1veinsuchactivitiesasboxingandwrest1ingandthiswou1dprobab1ynegative1yaffecttheirordinary1ife.Butitseemsdifficu1tforthegovernmenttodrawac1ear1inebetweenthesafeanddangeroussports.Iftheybannedfootba11andbasketba11,therewou1dprobab1ybeadisputebetweenasignificantnumberoffansandthegovernment.Thisis1arge1ybecausethosesportsgaintremendouspopu1aritywor1dwide.Onthecontrary,manyho1dtheviewthatpeop1eshou1dbegrantedtochoosewhateversportstheyfavor,regard1essofitsdanger.Itappearsreasonab1eforpeop1etomaketheirowndecisionforadu1tsarerationa1enoughtodistinguishwhethertheyarecapab1eofparticipatinginthosesportssothattheycou1davoidthedetrimenta1consequences.Eveniftheyareinjured,theycou1dberesponsib1efortheirowndecision.However,whentheyoutharetakenintoaccount,moreconsiderationtendstobeneededsincetheyare1ess1ike1ytobeascautiousastheadu1ts.Thismeansunexpectedconsequencesoftakingpartindangeroussportssti11exist.Inconc1usion,Itendtoarguethatadu1tscou1dhavetherighttochoosewhateversportstheyparticipateinseeingthattheyarematureenoughtomakeadecisionwhi1eapparent1ydangeroussportsforchi1drensuchasboxingandwrest1ingshou1dberestricted,orotherwisetheyshou1dbesupervisedtotakepartin.Somepeop1ethinkzoosarecj1anda11thezoosshou1dbec1osed.However,somepeop1ethinkzoosareusefu1toprotecttherareanima1s.Discussboththeseviewsandgiveyouropinion.Inthecurrentsociety,wehavemuchaccesstoknowingdifferentanima1s.Visitingthezooisoneoftheconvenientways.However,thereisanincreasingdebateaboutwhetherthezooshou1dbeestab1ished,andbeopenedtothepub1ic.Differentpeop1ehavecomparab1eopinions.Somepeop1ethinkzoosarehorrib1e,anditisunfairtoanima1s.Theythinkourgovernmentshou1dc1osethezoo.Themostimportantreasonisthatanima1sbe1ongtonature,andzoosarenottheirrea1home.Andinsomeway,1ivinginzoosiscrucia1toanima1s.Withtimegoesby,theyW川IOSetheirfundamenta1Sk川Swhichareessentia1toadaptingtowi1denvironment.Asreported,someanima1sthatspendinga1ongtimeonzoosfina11ydied,becauseofnotadaptingtothenatura11ifeagain.Weknowthatsomeanima1sare1ivingbygroups,buttheyarec1osedbyseparatewaysinthezoo.Anima1shavetheirown1iving,andweshou1dnotforbidit.A1thoughsomepeop1ethinkweshou1dc1osethezoo,othershavedifferentideas.Theythinkzoosareusefu1toprotecttherareanima1s,anditprovidesanima1sasafep1ace.First1y,manypeop1eareki11ingpreciouswi1danima1stoobtainmoremoney.Wecanseethatthenumberofrareanima1sisdecreasingfrommanynews.Zoosaregoodp1acestoho1dbacki11ega1actions.Second1y,theenvironmenthassufferedfrompo11ution,andsomeanima1sare1os