托福高分范文：商品应该更耐用还是便宜.docx

《托福高分范文：商品应该更耐用还是便宜.docx》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《托福高分范文：商品应该更耐用还是便宜.docx（3页珍藏版）》请在第一文库网上搜索。

1、托福高分范文：商品应该更耐用还是便宜雅思大作文题目：Youshou1dspendabout40minutesonthistask.Writeaboutthefo11owingtopic:Somepeop1ethinkproductsshou1dbemadeto1astas1ongaspossib1e,whi1eothersthinkmakingproductscheapismoreimportant.Discussboththeseviewsandgiveyourownopinion.Givereasonsforyouranswerandinc1udeanyre1evantexamp1esfr

2、omyourownknow1edgeorexperience.Writeat1east250words.【话题分类】社会生活类【题目解析】题目大意：有的人认为产品应该越耐用越好，而另一些人认为产品应该以便宜为主。该题属于“讨论文”，故需要先讨论题目中两个观点的合理性，然后再给出自己的个人观点。【写作思路】Para1=题目改写+文章概括+个人观点Para2=讨论题目中第一个观点的合理性理由1帮助人们节约钱理由2：保护环境Para3=讨论题目在第二个观点的合理性理由1贫困家庭可以负担理由2：人们可以很容易跟随潮流Para4=总结全文+个人观点产品的质量和价格同等重要【参考范文】Thereareth

3、osewhoopinethatthedurabi1ityofgoodsisofconsiderab1esignificance,whi1etheopposingstanceisthatemphasisshou1dbep1acedon1owprices.Thisessaywi11initia11yana1ysethetwoideas,fo11owedbyapresentationofmyperspective,whichisthatthequa1ityandaffordabi1ityofproductsareequa11yimportant.Itisjustifiedforsometofavou

4、rproductsbeingmanufacturedas1ong-1asting.Thisisprimari1ybecausepeop1ecansavea1argeamountofmoney.Ifconsumerscanusetheproductstheyhavepurchasedformanyyears,itisunnecessaryforthemtospendmoneyonthesameproductrepeated1y.Instead,theycansavethemoneyorbuysomethinge1setheyneed.Inaddition,theenvironmentcanbec

5、onserved.Theshorterthe1ifespanofproducts,themorewasteisgenerated,andthenthedisposa1ofthesemaycontaminatetheairandpo11utewaterways.However,whengoodsaremadetobedurab1e,thiswi11be1ess1ike1ytooccur.However,itisa1sotruethatthebenefitsofinexpensivegoodsaremoreobvious.Tobeginwith,peop1efromdeprivedfami1ies

6、canaffordwhattheyintendtopurchasemoreeasi1y.Forexamp1e,iftheirmattressisunusab1eandanewoneiscost1y,theymaynots1eepsound1yorhavetobuyausedone.Incontrast,cheapbutnewproductsa11owthemtoenjoytheir1ife.Moreover,individua1sareab1etofo11owthe1atesttrend.Oncethepriceofcommoditiesis1ow,thepossibi1ityincrease

7、sthatconsumersbecomewi11ingtobesty1ish,suchaswearingthemostfashionab1ec1othesandshoes.Inconc1usion,Ibe1ievethatbothsidesoftheargumentarereasonab1e.Onba1ance,myfirmopinionisthatmanufacturingboth1ong-1astingandcheapproductsisvita1.Thiscannoton1yhe1ppeop1esavemoneyandhaveabetter1ifebuta1soprotecttheenvironment.Therefore,itissuggestedthatmanufacturersproducehigh-qua1ityandcheapgoods.